MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336825977

R.R.S. Charles Darwin Cruise 159, 1st-30th July 2004, Fairlie, Scotland to St. John's, Newfoundland. For the RAPID Climate Change Research Programme of NERC under grant NER/T/S/2002/00436

2005· book· en· W2336825977 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
I Nick McCave

Bibliographic record

VenueDepartment of Earth Sciences EPrints Repository · 2005
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographyHydrographyCoringForaminiferaAcoustic Doppler current profilerGeologyCruiseMarine geologyBathythermographGeographyCurrent (fluid)Drilling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cruise Charles Darwin 159 was primarily devoted to coring with ancillary CTD work in the North Atlantic between Scotland and Newfoundland. The sampling program was most successful, due to unusually good weather in July (1-30, 2004), recovering 30 box cores, 19 piston cores, 6 kasten cores, 9 other short gravity cores and 20 CTD casts as well as 28 surface water samples for trace metals, 28 for plankton and isotopes, and 20 filtered for foraminifera. It was undertaken in support of the NERC RAPID Climate Change programme. Objectives are to generate palaeoceanographic records of hydrographic changes (temperature, salinity, nutrients, flow speed) associated with sharp climate transitions of the last 16 ka seen in the Greenland ice cores. Samples and CTD casts were also taken at sites of former current meter deployments to calibrate proxies for flow speed and other hydrographic variables. Sampled areas were north of Rockall, S. Iceland slope and rise, Gardar Drift, S.E. Greenland margin, Eirik Drift, and Hamilton Spur and Orphan Spur off Labrador.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDepartment of Earth Sciences EPrints RepositorySame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207