MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336859496 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.90.034310

Lifetime measurements of the yrast<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math>and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mn>9</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math>states in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">As</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2014· article· lv· W2336859496 on OpenAlexaff
C. Morse, H. Iwasaki, A. Lemasson, T. Baugher, D. Bazin, J. S. Berryman, Α. Dewald, C. Fransen, A. Gade, S. McDaniel, A. Nichols, A. Ratkiewicz, S. R. Stroberg, P. Voss, R. Wadsworth, D. Weißhaar, K. Wimmer, R. Winkler

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2014
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsYrastAtomic physicsEnergy (signal processing)NucleonQuantum mechanicsExcited state

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lifetimes of the yrast ${8}^{+}$ and ${9}^{+}$ states of $^{70}\mathrm{As}$ have been measured via the $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray lineshape method following population by the ${}^{9}\mathrm{Be}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{(}^{78}\mathrm{Rb},{}^{70}\mathrm{As})$ reaction at 101.6 MeV/nucleon. The strength of the $E1\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}{8}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{7}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ transition is found to be $B(E1)=1.3(5)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5} {e}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\text{fm}}^{2}$ or $1.2(4)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$ Weisskopf units (W.u.) while the ${9}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{8}^{+} M1$ transition is found to have a strength of $B(M1)=1.5(8) {\ensuremath{\mu}}_{N}^{2}$ or $0.85(42)$ W.u. The implications for the structure of these states is discussed and found to be consistent with an assignment to a $\ensuremath{\pi}{g}_{9/2}\ensuremath{\nu}{g}_{9/2}$ configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.008
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0090.011
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207