MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336934752 · doi:10.4000/alsace.2370

Fêtes et processions : une occupation rituelle de l’espace public

2015· article· fr· W2336934752 on OpenAlexaff
Benoît Jordan

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d’Alsace · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcessionHumanitiesArtEthnologyGeographyArchaeologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La notion de fête est intimement liée au calendrier liturgique chrétien. Certaines dates renvoient à des solennités dont la célébration demande une ampleur inaccoutumée : la Fête-Dieu, mais aussi les Rogations, les fêtes de certains saints tutélaires. Si des constantes, fixées par les rituels, sont évidentes au niveau diocésain, chaque paroisse peut avoir ses coutumes spécifiques. Au-delà de l’aspect dévotionnel, la fête et la procession constituent également un moteur important de la conscience collective d’une communauté.Parmi les formes que revêtent les fêtes, la procession constitue un marqueur catholique qui mobilise la population d’une communauté paroissiale et fait appel à des objets du culte spécifiques : bannières, croix de procession, dais, décors éphémères.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d’AlsaceSame topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207