MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Non Invasive Evaluation of Cardiac Dysfunction in β‐thalassemic Mice

2008· article· en· W2336954331 on OpenAlexafffund
Ékatherina Stoyanova, Guy Cloutier, Hady Felfly, Marie Trudel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research InstituteUniversité de MontréalComputer Research Institute of MontréalMontreal General Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineThalassemiaInternal medicineCardiologyCirculatory systemCardiac function curveHemolytic anemiaAnemiaEndocrinologyMuscle hypertrophyLeft ventricular hypertrophyHeart failureBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beta‐thalassemia is a genetic hematological disorder characterized by mutations of the hemoglobin gene causing total or partial decrease of the β‐globin chain production. This disease leads to a chronic hemolytic anemia, cardiac complications and blood circulatory problems such as transitory ischemic attacks, thromboembolic events and microcirculatory obstructions. Our objective is to study and dissect the molecular physiologic mechanism of cardiovascular dysfunction in β‐thalassemia. We have generated a murine model of β‐thalassemia major primarily for the investigation of the cardiovascular physiology. Left ventricular morphology and function were assessed by echocardiography in 13.5‐month‐old β‐thalassemic mice and age matched controls. The left ventricular mass index and total peripheral vascular resistance were significantly increased ( p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) in β‐thalassemic mice compared to wildtype controls. Furthermore, fractional shortening and cardiac output index were significantly decreased ( p < 0.01) in β‐thalassemic mice compared to age matched controls. Thus, these data in β‐thalassemic mice showed left ventricular remodeling by dilatation and hypertrophy that likely play a key role in cardiac dysfunction. This work was supported by the NIH (#RO1HL078655), CIHR (#CMI 72323), HSFC (#PG‐05‐0313).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→French-language works237,207→