MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336966427 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggv257

Finite-volume modelling of geophysical electromagnetic data on unstructured grids using potentials

2015· article· en· W2336966427 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite volume methodHelmholtz equationDiscretizationTetrahedronUniquenessUnstructured gridMagnetic potentialBenchmark (surveying)Scalar (mathematics)Electromagnetic fieldElectromagneticsComputer scienceApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsFinite element methodGeologyMathematicsBoundary value problemGeometryMechanicsGrid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solution of the geophysical electromagnetic (EM) modelling problem on unstructured tetrahedral-Voronoï grids using EM potentials is investigated. Unstructured grids enable accurate representation of geological structures and interfaces and allow local refinements that can be beneficial in the mesh, for example, at the observation points and at the source. The time-harmonic Helmholtz equation in terms of EM potentials together with the equation of conservation of charge are discretized on staggered tetrahedral-Voronoï grids using a finite-volume method and solved in a total-field approach. The solutions are the total-field quantities of vector and scalar potentials along the edges and at the nodes of the tetrahedral elements, respectively. Two benchmark models with electric and magnetic sources are employed for verification. Also, to illustrate the versatility of the scheme, data for a model of the Ovoid ore body at Voisey's Bay, Labrador, Canada, are synthesized and compared with real helicopter-borne data. The finite-volume results show good agreement with those from the literature and with the real data. The Coulomb gauge is used for ensuring the uniqueness of the potentials in order to study the galvanic and inductive components of the solutions. The results indicate an agreement between the relative importance of these two components and the anticipated coupling of the source with the conductivity model. The solution of the gauged and ungauged schemes using iterative and direct solvers is studied and compared with the solution of a direct EM-field scheme. The results demonstrate that the potential-based schemes can be solved by iterative solvers unlike the corresponding EM-field scheme. An accuracy study is also conducted which showed the higher accuracy of the solutions from the potential method compared to those from the direct EM-field method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it