MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337260076 · doi:10.4095/213072

Constraints on the age of the Klinkit assemblage east of Teslin Lake, northern British Columbia

2002· report· en· W2337260076 on OpenAlexaffabout
C F Roots, Tekla A. Harms, Ronald-E. Simard, Michael J. Orchard, Larry M. Heaman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssemblage (archaeology)ArchaeologyGeographyGeologyPhysical geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Volcaniclastic and overlying dark sedimentary rocks of the Klinkit assemblage (NTS 104-O/11) are the youngest of several arc remnants that lie between the Cassiar Platform and Cache Creek terrane in the British Columbia-Yukon border area. New U-Pb geochronological and micropaleontological data indicate Late Carboniferous (or younger) to Late Triassic age for the assemblage. Limestone at the base of the Klinkit assemblage contains Bashkirian conodonts. Intrusive rocks, more deformed than the Klinkit assemblage, are ca. 340 Ma and ca. 320 Ma. A tuff, probably correlative with the Klinkit assemblage, yielded an Early Permian (ca. 281 Ma) date. Middle to Late Triassic conodonts were recovered from the argillaceous upper unit. We conclude that Klinkit volcanism, begun in the Late Carboniferous, continued through Permian time and was followed by Triassic clastic sedimentation. Correlative late Paleozoic volcanic centres and Triassic sedimentary rocks in the pericratonic belt are found in central Yukon and north-central British Columbia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207