MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337279887 · doi:10.33137/rr.v37i4.8737

Humanist Marriage and <i>The Comedy of Errors</i>

2001· article· fr· W2337279887 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thomas H. Luxon

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComedyHumanitiesPhilosophyArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude du mariage et de l’amitié examine une gamme de textes proto-modernes, d’autant religieux que séculaires, pour conclure sur une nouvelle lecture de la Comedy of Errors de Shakespeare comme révélation comique de l’instabilité de l’idée de représenter le mariage en termes d’amitié tout en gardant la rhétorique orthodoxe de la subordination et de l’inégalité. La pièce, propose l’auteur, pousse la rhétorique du «deuxième soi-même» et d’«une chair» jusqu’à des extrémités exposant non seulement les auto-contradictions de chaque orthodoxie, classique ainsi que chrétienne, mais aussi les difficultés qui en découlent lorsqu’elles sont confondues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207