Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to survey the theory and practice of corporate liquid assets. A survey of the pertinent literature will be made to determine the theory concerned with the management of corporate liquid assets. The practice of the management of corporate liquid assets is examined at two levels. The first is a historical review of empirical data of Canadian corporations. The data used is aggregate in nature with corporations grouped into eleven industrial classes and ten asset size categories. With the aid of the computer various ratios are calculated. The transactions (sales) and wealth (asset) approach will be used. The second level of practice involves an examination of the policies and practices of liquid asset management in one specific manufacturing company, the Standard Oil Company of British Columbia Limited. The theory considers factors external and internal to the corporation that influence its need for and management of liquid assets. Four main external factors are: (1) the demand for money, (2) the development of the Canadian short-term money market, (3) the competitive environment, and (4) improvements in technology, education, and management skills. The theory suggests a number of internal factors are also influential in determining the need for and management of corporate liquid assets. They are: (1) corporate policy, (2) the ability of management to plan and control, (3) the individual firm's demand for money, (4) the size and nature of corporate organization and activity, (5) the age of a corporation, (6) the firm's cost of capital, and (7) the firm's growth rate. The survey of the practice of corporate liquid assets at the aggregate level suggests that firms of most industrial classes and asset size categories have during the 1951-64 period: (1) increased the use of the cash balances they hold, (2) freed liquid assets to be used in more attractive alternative means, and (3) shifted their portfolio of liquid assets so as to hold a greater proportion of interest earning forms, especially higher yielding nongovernment forms. The review of the policies and practices of liquid asset management at the Standard Oil Company of British Columbia Limited indicates the effective application of much of the theory. However, various characteristics specific to the company clearly indicate that all the theory and the general practices based on aggregate empirical data are not likely to be observed in the management of one company's liquid assets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".