MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337372717 · doi:10.1080/23302674.2015.1078858

Coordination of a two-level supply chain (manufacturer–retailer) with permissible delay in payments

2015· article· en· W2337372717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Systems Science Operations & Logistics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityToronto Metropolitan University
FundersSaudi Arabian Cultural Bureau
KeywordsSupply chainPaymentIncentiveBusinessProduction (economics)Industrial organizationMicroeconomicsVariable (mathematics)Operations managementEconomicsMarketingFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a supply chain coordination to be effective and profitable, it requires a working mechanism among the members of a supply chain to financially entice some players to cooperate. Permissible delay in payments is one of the most commonly practised incentives by businesses to achieve this cooperation. This paper investigates a two-level (manufacturer–retailer) supply chain, with a permissible delay in payments as a decision variable. First, the paper modifies three known models of different production and shipping policies to account for delays in payments; it then compares them and highlights the production policy that performed the best with total system cost as a performance measure. A sensitivity analysis is also utilised to test and identify the limitations of the three models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it