MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337389052 · doi:10.1136/bmj.h5451

Gordon Thomas Dickinson

2015· article· en· W2337389052 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Research and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeDaughterNew englandClassicsPsychoanalysisHistoryPsychologySociologyLawPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian psychiatrist and medical editor From general practitioner to journalist to stockbroker to psychiatrist to psychoanalyst: such was the curiously meandering career of Gordon Dickinson, sometime editor of the Canadian Medical Association Journal ( CMAJ ). These abrupt changes of direction inevitably had an impact on his family. “Over the time I was married to him,” his ex-wife Mary Lou reflects, “I felt like I’d been married to five different people.” His daughter, Andrea Dickinson, says, “He did tell me that he liked the opportunity to do different things. Nowadays it’s not unusual for people to have a number of careers over the course of their life, but in those days it was less common to go to a different discipline for a while.” Mary Lou Dickinson accepts the suggestion that her husband seems to have spent much of his working life finding out what he wanted to do. “But also making a contribution on the way,” she insists. CMAJ Dickinson was born to parents who had emigrated from England. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.433
GPT teacher head0.620
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it