La liberte d’association: perspectives philosophiques et historiques (Freedom of Association: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
French Abstract: Ce bref survol des fondements historiques et philosophiques de la liberte d’association tend a demontrer que le fait que la liberte d’association soit interpretee par les tribunaux dans une perspective individualiste et selon une philosophie politique liberale n’est pas un accident. A cet egard precis, la liberte d’association n’est guere differente de l’ensemble des droits et libertes fondamentaux enchâsses dans les constitutions modernes : il ne s’agit pas la d’un detournement « bourgeois » d’une nature fondamentale et atemporelle, mais d’une verite sur le contexte de l’apparition de ces droits comme categories de la pensee et de l’organisation de la societe liberale.English Abstract: This brief overview of the historical and philosophical foundations of the freedom of association argues that its interpretation by the courts from an individualist perspective and according to a liberal political philosophy is not an accident. In this sense, the freedom of association is no different from all of the fundamental rights and liberties protected by modern constitutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".