MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337444677 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139019842.013

Atmospheric protection and climate change

2012· book-chapter· en· W2337444677 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Philippe Sands, Jacqueline Peel, Adriana Fabra Aguilar, Ruth MacKenzie

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreatyAtmosphere (unit)Environmental protectionEnvironmental scienceInternational lawOzone layerEnvironmental lawClimate changePollutantUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the SeaMontreal ProtocolEnvironmental planningLawPolitical scienceOzoneGeographyMeteorologyChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION The protection of the atmosphere was a relative latecomer to international environmental regulation but is now well established. With limited exceptions, until 1979 no treaty sought, as its primary purpose, to place limits on the right of states to allow atmospheric emissions that caused environmental damage. Some treaties had, however, called for general preventive strategies. Since 1979, numerous treaties and other international acts have addressed the protection of the atmosphere. Although there is no atmospheric equivalent to the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, international legal instruments have been adopted at the regional and global level which address a range of issues, including: transboundary pollution by sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, volatile organic compounds, heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants (POPs); the protection of the ozone layer; the prevention of climate change; and the protection of the environment of outer space. The precedents set by treaties relating to the protection of other environmental media, in particular the marine environment, have contributed to the development of these rules. Landmarks in the development of international law in this area include: the 1938 and 1941 decisions in the Trail Smelter case; the applications brought to the ICJ by Australia and New Zealand against France with respect to French atmospheric nuclear tests in the Pacific Ocean region; growing evidence in Europe and North America in the 1970s of acid rain damage from atmospheric emissions of sulphur compounds; the 1986 Chernobyl accident; growing evidence in the 1980s of depletion of the ozone layer; greater awareness of the threats posed by forest fires with transnational effects, such as those in Indonesia in 1997 which caused widespread regional problems, and, mostly recently, consolidation of scientific evidence that increased atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are likely to cause temperatures to increase worldwide with consequential adverse effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicMaritime Transport Emissions and EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207