ATP triggered drug release and DNA co-delivery systems based on ATP responsive aptamers and polyethylenimine complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for anticancer drug and gene co-delivery are a promising strategy in cancer therapy due to their combination of chemotherapy and gene therapy. In this work, we developed a facile and effective method to fabricate stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for anticancer drug and gene co-delivery based on complexes of polyethylenimine (PEI) with an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) responsive aptamer duplex (ARAD). No chemical reactions or complex modifications were used in the construction processes. In this system, Doxorubicin-loaded aptamer duplex and plasmid DNA (p53) can be bound by PEI by electronic interactions to form stable complexes which effectively protect the aptamer and p53 from DNase degradation. The intercalated Dox can be released on-demand by a structural change in the aptamer duplex in an ATP-rich environment. The morphology and average size of the nanocarriers were characterized by zeta potential and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The nanocarriers exhibit lower cell toxicity in HeLa cell lines relative to PEI. RT-PCR and Western blot analysis confirmed that p53 could be effectively delivered and expressed in HeLa cells by PEI/ARAD/p53 complexes. Moreover, the apoptosis percentage of HeLa cells treated with PEI/ARAD/Dox/p53 complex increased to 40.8%, compared to 24.7% for PEI/ARAD/Dox complex and 11.5% for PEI/ARAD/p53, respectively. The result demonstrated that the combinatorial delivery of Dox and p53 by nanocarriers could induce synergistic actions and lead to effective cancer cell apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".