Convergence, divergence et filiation linguistique: retour à l’étude panlectale de la variation en français
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les français parlés en milieux minoritaires au Canada sont probablement les français vernaculaires les plus étudiés en sociolinguistique francophone. L’étude comparée des locutions adverbiales de restriction rien que/juste/seulement/seulement que/ne que de Mougeon, Hallion, Bigot, et Papen publiée dans ce volume s'inscrit dans une longue tradition de recherches systématiques sur les structures grammaticales variables en milieux minoritaires, telles que la morphologie de l'auxiliaire aller (Mougeon et al. 1988; 2010), l'usage des futurs analytique et synthétique (Poplack et Turpin 1999, Nadasdi et al. 2003), la neutralisation des formes masculines de tout (Lemieux et Sankoff 1983; Bigot et Papen 2015) et les formes irrégulières de l'imparfait (Hallion Bres 2006; Papen et Bigot 2010), pour ne citer que quelques-uns des aspects les plus étudiés. La présente contribution de Mougeon et ses collègues à l’étude de la restriction dans quatre variétés de français originaires de l'expansion du français vers l'Ouest de la province du Québec possède, néanmoins, une portée bien plus large que la plupart des études préalables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".