MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337684704

Interpretive essays on class formation and class struggle

2015· book· en· W2337684704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bryan D. Palmer

Bibliographic record

VenueBRILL eBooks · 2015
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClass conflictSolidarityWorking classClass formationDissentClass analysisProletariatPolitical scienceLabor historySociologyPoliticsPolitical economyEconomic historyGender studiesHistoryLawLabor relations
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acknowledgements Introduction PART I: CLASS STRUGGLE BEFORE THE CONSOLIDATION OF CLASS 1. Discordant Music: Charivaris and Whitecapping in Nineteenth-Century North America 2. Popular Radicalism and the Theatrics of Rebellion: The Hybrid Discourse of Dissent in Upper Canada in the 1830s PART II: WORKERS' CULTURES, STRUGGLES, AND MOBILISATIONS IN THE AGE OF CAPITALIST CONSOLIDATION, 1860-1920 3. In Street and Field and Hall: The Culture of Hamilton Workingmen, 1860-1914 4. The Bonds of Unity: The Knights of Labor in Ontario, 1880-1900 5. Class, Conception and Conflict: The Thrust for Efficiency, Managerial Views of Labour, and the Working Class Rebellion, 1903-22 PART III: CLASS STRUGGLE IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE POST-WAR SETTLEMENT 6. Wildcat Workers in the 1960s: The Unruly Face of Class Struggle 7. British Columbia's Solidarity: Reformism and the Fight Against the Right PART IV: REMAPPING THE LANDSCAPE OF CLASS FORMATION: COMPARISONS AND CONJUNCTURES IN LABOUR HISTORY'S TELESCOPED LONGUE DUREE 8. Social Formation and Class Formation in North America, 1800-1900 9. 'Cracking the Stone': The Long History of Capitalist Crisis and Toronto's Dispossessed, 1830-1930 10. What's Law Got to Do with It? Historical Considerations on Class Struggle, Boundaries of Constraint, and Capitalist Authority References Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBRILL eBooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207