CONFÉRENCE SUR LA PRATIQUE CLINIQUE DE L’ACIO-CANO Élaboration et mise en place par ActionCancer Manitoba d’un programme d’administration d’immunoglobuline par voie sous-cutanée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La conférence de l’ACIO-CANO sur la pratique clinique met en évidence un programme novateur des soins infirmiers qui améliore les soins aux patients et la qualité de vie des personnes aux prises avec le cancer. C’est un privilège de pouvoir communiquer au personnel infirmier en oncologie du Canada les détails relatifs au programme d’administration d’immunoglobulines par voie sous-cutanée d’ActionCancer Manitoba (ACMB). Non seulement notre programme offre-t-il aux patients diagnostiqués d’un cancer la possibilité de recevoir leur traitement de soutien par immunoglobulines à domicile, mais il donne aussi l’occasion au personnel infirmier de faire participer les patients en les amenant à prendre leurs soins en charge. Ce programme montre à quel point une possibilité d’innover et de mettre en place un changement à la fois axé sur le patient, entrepris par le personnel infirmier et d’une importance appréciable a mené à d’importants résultats positifs pour nos patients et notre établissement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.036 | 0.046 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".