MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2337877636 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov204.08

ATPS-08DISCOVERY OF NOVEL GLIOMA-TARGETING PEPTIDES USING A HIGH-THROUGHPUT MICROFLUIDIC MAGNETIC-ACTIVATED SORTER

2015· article· en· W2337877636 on OpenAlexaff
Choi‐Fong Cho, Fernanda C. Bononi, Justin M. Wolfe, Bradley L. Pentelute, Leonard G. Luyt, Mariano S. Viapiano, E. Antonio Chiocca, Sean Lawler

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliomaPeptideBeadPeptide libraryMicrofluidicsBrain tissueBrain cancerChemistryMolecular biologyCancer researchCancerNanotechnologyBiochemistryBiologyMaterials scienceNeurosciencePeptide sequenceGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-grade gliomas are associated with very poor survival. Aggressive brain tumor cells invade into the surrounding normal brain and are impossible to remove by surgery. These cells are protected inside the brain from cancer drugs, leading inevitably to tumor regrowth and ultimately, patient death. There is an urgent need to develop therapeutics that can effectively enter the brain and target cancer cells. A protein called B/bΔg is an ideal target because it is present only in glioma cells, and is absent from normal brain cells. One-bead-one-compound (OBOC) libraries, which are composed of tens of thousands to millions of beads, each coated with a unique compound are widely used tools for discovering novel targeting ligands. In a search for glioma-specific peptides, we have screened an OBOC peptide library by labeling positive ‘hit’ beads with small magnetic particles coated with a B/bΔg-derived peptide. To isolate the magnetized ‘hit’ beads, we have developed a cost-effective and reproducible microfluidic magnetic-activated bead sorter. We have demonstrated that this device can rapidly sort magnetized OBOC beads with high throughput (15,000 beads per hour), specificity (>96%) and sensitivity (>99%). We have isolated several hundred ‘hit’ beads that were then subjected to a secondary screen using B/bΔg-overexpressing cells. Using these strategies, we have isolated and identified 8 novel B/bΔg-targeted peptides. All 8 peptides displayed increased uptake by B/bΔg-overexpressing cells compared to control cells. This increase in cellular uptake was not observed when control peptides were used. Circular dichroism analyses and competition studies revealed that 3 of these peptides displayed specific binding to the B/bΔg-derived peptide. Binding kinetics analyses and in vivo tests are currently underway. These peptides have great potential to be developed into next-generation therapeutic agents against high-grade gliomas that can be translated to improve outcome and quality of life in brain cancer patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques→French-language works237,207→