MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337886179 · doi:10.58079/qx4b

Colloque - "Séminaire de recherche/GRÉLQ"

2009· article· fr· W2337886179 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
michellenguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPortraitArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

«Quand il ne suffit pas de traduire ou les défis de la diffusion des traductions littéraires au Canada» SHERBROOKE - Le GRÉLQ recevra Agnès Whitfield le vendredi 27 mars 2009 dans le cadre de ses séminaires de recherche. Madame Whitfield est professeure titulaire au Département d'études anglaises de l'Université York. Traductrice littéraire, elle a dirigé deux ouvrages sur le sujet au Canada: l'un en français, Le métier du double: portraits de traductrices et traducteurs littéraires, paru en...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.011
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicTranslation Studies and PracticesFrench-language works237,207