MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338019533 · doi:10.1177/1066480716628583

Authenticating Family

2016· article· en· W2338019533 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Family Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersFamily Process Institute
KeywordsStepfamilyLesbianThrivingHeterosexismPridePsychologyCONTESTNegotiationSocial psychologySociologyGender studiesPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Authenticating family is a process of becoming a lesbian stepfamily, working to affirm strong and healthy family relationships, and learning to accept nothing less than acknowledgment and inclusion as legitimate. Authenticating family demonstrates that the internal function of becoming a stepfamily is not dissimilar to that of heterosexual stepfamilies. Frequent encounters that are heterosexist underscore the challenges faced by lesbian stepfamilies. The new stepfamily faces obstacles that contest the sense of legitimacy for all family members. These families learn from multiple interactions among themselves and with outsiders how to negotiate a new understanding of family. The conditions that impact the process are age of the children, support, and heterosexism. The lesbian stepfamily develops the ability to demonstrate pride to a society that has marginalized in the past, even as society is evolving in acceptance. There are three stages in authenticating family: accepting the challenge, building the bonds, and thriving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it