Off-the-Grid Low-Rank Matrix Recovery and Seismic Data Reconstruction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Matrix sensing problems capitalize on the knowledge that a data matrix of interest exhibits low rank properties. This low dimensional structure often arises because the data matrix is obtained by sampling a smooth function on a regular (or structured) grid. However, in many practical situations the measurements are taken on an irregular grid (that is accurately known). This results in an “unstructured data matrix” that is less fit for the low rank model in comparison to its regular counterpart and therefore subject to degraded reconstruction via rank penalization techniques. In this paper, we propose and analyze a modified low-rank matrix recovery work-flow that admits unstructured observations. By incorporating a regularization operator which accurately maps structured data to unstructured data, into the nuclear-norm minimization problem, we are able to compensate for data irregularity. Furthermore, by construction our formulation yields output that is supported on a structured grid. We establish recovery error bounds for our methodology and offer matrix sensing and matrix completion numerical experiments including applications to seismic trace interpolation to demonstrate the potential of the approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it