MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338072960

Citizen Media Research and Verification: An Analytical Framework for Human Rights Practitioners

2016· other· en· W2338072960 on OpenAlexaff
Christoph Koettl

Bibliographic record

VenueApollo (University of Cambridge) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
FundersUniversity of OxfordYale University
KeywordsHuman rightsSpace (punctuation)Corporate governanceWork (physics)Media studiesPolitical scienceLibrary scienceSociologyPublic relationsLawEngineeringManagementComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This CGHR Practitioner Paper series, by and for practitioners, provides a space to consolidate, reflect upon, and share knowledge of human rights in the digital age. Contributors also present their work to the CGHR community, and prospective contributors are welcome to contact CGHR with submissions. Series Editor: Ella McPherson Publisher: Centre of Governance and Human Rights, University of Cambridge Contact: www.cghr.polis.cam.ac.uk, cghr@polis.cam.ac.uk, (+44) (0)1223 767 257

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.128
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.122
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1280.122
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0170.015
Science and technology studies0.0120.092
Scholarly communication0.0400.057
Open science0.0040.020
Research integrity0.0120.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApollo (University of Cambridge)Same topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207