Q2 How wetland type and area differ through scale: A GEOBIA case study in Alberta's
Bibliographic record
Abstract
article i nfo It is estimated that Canada comprises approximately 28% of the world's wetlands (~1.5 million km 2 ) providing essential ecological services such as purifying water, nutrient cycling, reducing flooding, recharging ground water supplies, and protecting shorelines. In order to better understand how wetland type and area differ over a range of spatial and thematic scales, this paper introduces a multi-scale geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) approach that incorporates new object-based texture measures (geotex) and a decision-tree classifier (See5), to assess wetland differences through five common spatial resolutions (5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 m) and two different thematic classification schemes. Themes are based on (i) a Ducks Unlimited (DU: 15 class) regional classification system for wetlands in the Boreal Plain Ecosystem and (ii) the Canadian Wetland Inventory (CWI: 5 classes). Results reveal that the highest overall accuracies (67.9% and 82.2%) were achieved at the 10 m spatial resolution for both the DU and CWI classification schemes respectively. It was also found that the DU wetland types experienced greater area differences through scale with the largest differences for both classification schemes occurring in classes with a large treed component. Results further show that the inclusion of geotex channels (generated from dynamically sized and shaped window that measures the spatial variability of the wetland components composing a scene, rather than of individual pixels within a fixed sized window) improved wetland classification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".