The War Narrative Extracted from Photo, Journal, and Letters in Joy Kogawa's Obasan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Joy Kogawa's Obasan (1981) powerfully protests the racial discrimination, describing the women's experiences in the evacuation camp during World War II, and contributes to the fulfillment of the Canadian redress movements in the 1980s. In Obasan, a journal, letters and family a photo play the important roles in protesting the evacuation and the war. Aunt Emily's journal, Grandmother's letters, and a family photo polyphonically reflect with each other, and complement the fragmental and Naomi's forgotten memories of the evacuation. One of the characteristics in Obasan is that the evacuation experiences are depicted in the form of fragmental memories of Naomi Megumi Nakane, who is a 36-year-old Sansei. She wants to forget the painful evacuation which causes family's disintegration ; her father's death and mother's stay in Japan are triggered by the evacuation, which results in her deep psychological trauma. Her memories of the past, however, are to be awakened by her Aunt Emily's journal, Grandmother's letters from Japan, and the family photo. They bring her consciousness back to the past that she has forgotten. Although all the private writing in Obasan plays the significant roles, the most influential writing is Aunt Emily's journal. It not only complements Naomi's memories but also revises the evacuation history ignored in Canadian historical cannon. The journal of Aunt Emily who is a Nisei activist revises the political process of the evacuation. It is impossible for Naomi to narrate the evacuation experience in the political dimension because she was 5 years old when World War II broke out. Instead of Naomi, Emily's journal, whose form is written in the epistle to Naomi's mother, fully uncovers the concealed historical facts: the aggravator of the discrimination in the beginning of the War, and the Canadian governmental policy of the evacuation, Japanese-Canadian Niseis' resistance against the evacuation, and family dispersion in the wartime. Such detailed historical reconstruction and powerful voices against injustice are not found in the works by Japanese-American female writers. Naomi, however, in the early stage, does not approve of Emily's journal, which protests against the unjust treatment of Japanese-Canadians. Though the journal revises what Japanese-Canadians undergo in the wartime, it does not reveal Naomi's personal experience before or during the evacuation. What arouses Naomi's dormant personal memories is an old photo which snaps very young Naomi and her mother. The photo awakens memories of her childhood, and it makes 36-year-old Naomi have symbolical nightmares. The nightmares incarnate what the war is ; namely the nightmares suggest the war is that the historical repetition of the national violence based on greed, selfishness, and hatred (238). It is Grandmother's letters from Japan that solve Naomi's doubt about the mother's absence. In the very end of the novel, when the letters that Naomi cannot read are translated for her, her mother's death is finally revealed. The letters reveal that Naomi's mother who leaves for Japan before the war is dead because of the atomic bomb dropped in Nagasaki. Then we can say that the letters play two significant roles ; one is to restore the split relationship between Naomi and her mother, and the other to reconsider the relation between victims and perpetrators at war, addressing the subject of the atomic bomb. The family photo, Emily's journal, and the letters are something like old fibers which are weaved into the new fabric. Obasan becomes not only the complement of Naomi's personal memories and the historical revision of Japanese-Canadians but also develops the universal war narrative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".