Age-Related Changes in Frontal Network Structural and Functional Connectivity in Relation to Bimanual Movement Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes in both brain structure and neurophysiological function regulating homotopic as well as heterotopic interhemispheric interactions (IHIs) are assumed to be responsible for the bimanual performance deficits in older adults. However, how the structural and functional networks regulating bimanual performance decline in older adults, as well as the interplay between brain structure and function remain largely unclear. Using a dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm, we examined the age-related changes in the interhemispheric effects from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and dorsal premotor cortex onto the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) during the preparation of a complex bimanual coordination task in human. Structural properties of these interactions were assessed with diffusion-based fiber tractography. Compared with young adults, older adults showed performance declines in the more difficult bimanual conditions, less optimal brain white matter (WM) microstructure, and a decreased ability to regulate the interaction between dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and M1. Importantly, we found that WM microstructure, neurophysiological function, and bimanual performance were interrelated in older adults, whereas only the task-related changes in IHI predicted bimanual performance in young adults. These results reflect unique interactions between structure and function in the aging brain, such that declines in WM microstructural organization likely lead to dysfunctional regulation of IHI, ultimately accounting for bimanual performance deficits. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The structural and functional changes in the aging brain are associated with a decline in movement control, compromising functional independence. We used MRI and noninvasive brain stimulation techniques to investigate white matter microstructural organization and neurophysiological function in the aging brain, in relation to bimanual movement control. We found that less optimal brain microstructural organization and task-related modulations in neurophysiological function resulted in poor bimanual performance in older adults. By interrelating brain structure, neurophysiological function, and behavior, the current study provides a comprehensive picture of biological alterations in the aging brain that underlie declines in bimanual performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".