Постать Антуана Володіна в дискурсі французького постмодернізму: «рупор постекзотизму»
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Досліджується феномен сучасного французького письменника Антуана Володіна. Констатується своєрідність художнього методу, що перебуває на межі естетичних систем та втілює ключові тенденції сучасної французької літератури. Виявляється проблема позиціонування автора в контексті постмодерністського дискурсу. Аналізується авторський неологізм «постекзотизм» як літературний задум, що є реалізацією філософських, жанрових та поетологічних концепцій письменника. Аналіз виявлених типологічних рис романів Антуана Володіна дозволяє віднести прозу письменника до однієї із новітніх трансформацій постмодернізму (максималізму). (This article deals with the phenomenon of Antoine Volodine, one of the most provocative and arguable writers in contemporary French literature. His novels are plentiful of the surrealism elements and appear on the merge of science fiction, dystopia, political and historical fiction. His innovative style of writing and original philosophical position attract huge attention of French, Canadian and Belgian critics; however it is almost ignored in Ukrainian literature research. In his novels Antoine Volodine creates a hyperrealist fictional universe abundant in fantastical elements, black humor, references to real wars and disasters of the 20th century. After analyzing the author`s philosophical, aesthetic and genre paradigm, Antoine Volodine`s key neologism «post-exotism» is examined. It is defined as a literature project realized by a community of authors (all being heteronyms of the same writer) with Antoine Volodine playing the role of their ‘mouthpiece’. Therefore the problemof the author`s positioning within the scope of French postmodern discourse is revealed. The analyses of writer`s methods (i.e. discursive multilevel crossing, hybrid narrative forms, hyperbolic style, phantasmagoric chronotope, myth-making trend, intertextuality and metatextuality, polyphony, heteronyms, so on) identifies that Antoine Vlodine`s poetics is on the merge of two main modern literature trends – modernism and postmodernism. An attempt is taken to prove that such methods are typical for the modern literature paradigm and correspond to the fundamental intention of postmodern literature – searching new poetic forms and writing methods on the ground of previous literature experience. Finally, we might conclude that Antoine Volodine`s novels may be referred to the discourse of postmodernism (maximalist fiction).)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".