MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338367361 · doi:10.7202/1035947ar

Ética profesional para la sociedad planetaria. Una perspectiva humanista compleja de la ética de las profesiones (Éthique professionnelle pour la société planétaire. Une perspective humaniste complexe de l’éthique des professions), López Calva et Juan Martín, México, UPAEP/GERNIKA, 2014

2015· article· fr· W2338367361 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Enrique Luengo González, Leonardo G. Rodríguez Zoya

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and bioethics in healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPerspective (graphical)PhilosophyHumanismTheologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ética profesional para la sociedad planetaria. Una perspectiva humanista compleja de la ética de las profesiones (Éthique professionnelle pour la société planétaire. Une perspective humaniste complexe de l’éthique des professions), López Calva et Juan Martín, México, UPAEP/GERNIKA, 2014. An article from journal Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales (Sur le thème de l’analyse de données textuelles informatisée), on Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.024
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles perspectives en sciences socialesSame topicEthics and bioethics in healthcareFrench-language works237,207