Bibliographic record
Abstract
The researches that have been conducted concerning Waly Salomão´s poetry aimed to analyze characteristics that demonstrate the presence of polyphony in his works, as well as dialogism, the assemble of many voices.The thought of myth as a part of Waly´s poetic is something that has not yet been studied, in other words, it is an unprecedented discussion.Wally´s poetry has many traditions, and it is noticeable in his writing the presence of mythological symbolism, classical tradition evocation and images that do not fade away within time, by the opposite, they are renewed because they are myths that repeat themselves and endure.By the light of that prospect, the aim of this dissertation is to analyze Wally´s Salomão work focusing mainly on Me segura qu´eu vou dar um troço e Algaravias, analyzing how the myth influences the poet´s verses who nominate himself as sailormoon, and reveals archetypes and images which are part of collective imagination and which serve on his poetic identity quest that is multiple.It is perceived, primarily, a fascination for mythical water in which the poet sails through different routes, reactivating myths and also giving them a new contemporary meaning.In order to fulfill these goals, among other authors, the works of Mircea Eliade, Gaston Bachelard and Gilbert Durand will be largely considered as theoretical background, attempting to identify mythical elements, archetypes and images from the collective imagination.Thereby, associating myth and poetry, the poet from Bahia, Wally Salomão, builds a writing that surpasses time barriers and prints innovation to his poetry, joining fragments from tradition that dilute in his verses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".