Wind-Diesel hybrid system: energy storage system selection method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada is an immense country and while most of the population is concentrated near the US border, there is more than 300 000 peoples living in isolated communities that are not connected to the electrical grid [1]. In those remote places, electricity is produced using diesel generators at very high economic and environmental costs. Since most of these locations possess good wind conditions an obvious solution to reduce this burden is to couple a wind turbine with the diesel generator. However, in the absence of a storage system, the penetration factor must be kept low due to the constraints related to the operation of the diesel generator. This leads to a waste of the wind turbine electricity and significantly reduces the economic interest of the method. Penetration factor can be largely increased by the addition of an energy storage system. The utilization of the excess energy allows a much more stable power and the complete stop of the diesel generators when they are not needed and a close to optimal performance of it, which reduces their maintenance cost. Nevertheless, the optimization of the whole system is critical to reach an adequate level of performance. This paper describes this optimization process and the selected system concept.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".