MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338430224 · doi:10.1080/03155986.2016.1166795

Makespan minimization for parallel machine scheduling of semi-resumable and non-resumable jobs with multiple availability constraints

2016· article· en· W2338430224 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJob shop schedulingMathematical optimizationMinificationComputer scienceComputationInteger programmingScheduling (production processes)HeuristicLinear programmingSingle-machine schedulingMathematicsAlgorithmSchedule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of makespan minimization for parallel machine scheduling with multiple non-availability periods for non-resumable, semi-resumable and resumable jobs is considered in this paper. The discussion of this problem is very limited in the current state of the literature, with most cases only considering a small subset of the problem such as a single machine with multiple non-availability periods or several machines with only one non-availability period. The problem is formulated as a mixed-integer linear programming model and solved optimally using CPLEX for small problems with multiple availability constraints on all machines. Several heuristic approaches are then applied to the problem to provide near-optimal solutions while significantly reducing the computation time. Numerical results are obtained for several experiments and the performance of the heuristic methods is analysed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it