MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338552706 · doi:10.26512/2015.12.t.19871

Assuntos inacabados: relações internacionais e a colonização dos povos Guarani e Kaiowá no Brasil contemporâneo

2015· dissertation· pt· W2338552706 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
João Nackle Urt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Development and Aid
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousSovereigntyPoliticsPolitical scienceState (computer science)GeographyEthnologySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent research has indicated the need to approach indigenous peoples as subjects of International Relations. The study of the relations of these groups with the international system would contribute not only to decolonize the area, but also to improve the understanding of contemporary global politics, particularly because the western model of sovereignty was constituted by exclusion of indigenous political models. This dissertation aims at comprehending how the expansion of the European system of states is related to the reduction of the scope of validity of indigenous sovereignties. Such is a type of relation between political units of different natures. The European system of states is based in an institutional model of an exclusivist territorial sovereignty, created inside the Christian cosmology, dominant in Western Europe. Indigenous sovereignties, on the other hand, are political-institutional models of peoples who live according to many other cosmologies, and that, at a given moment in their histories, have been identified as indigenous peoples. More specifically, this work approaches the occlusion of the sovereignties of the Guarani and the Kaiow peoples, in Brazil, and the socioeconomic consequences of this process, which translated into successive waves of impoverishment, leading to a contemporary situation of grave social exclusion. The method employed is the case study, with an undisciplined, compared and long term perspective. The contemporary situation of the Guarani and the Kaiow peoples is investigated in search of causalities in three levels: the global, the national and the local. With an interdisciplinary bibliographical research, this dissertation proposes an analysis of five centuries of colonization in each of the levels; with a compared perspective, the Brazilian case is confronted to colonial history and contemporary situation of indigenous peoples in six countries: Australia, Canada, Mexico, Peru, Indonesia and Russia. It also designs theoretically the sociological mechanism that connects the expansion of the European system of states, the advent and the consolidation of the Brazilian state, the occlusion of Guarani and Kaiow sovereignties, and the contemporary social exclusion of these peoples. It indicates that Guarani and Kaiow have their own forms of political sovereignty since the time of conquest, and that the territorial and social scopes of validity of their sovereignties have been reduced due to the advancement of Brazilian colonization. It demonstrates that social exclusion faced by Guarani and Kaiow communities -manifested in extreme poverty, violence and discrimination -is a direct consequence of the occlusion of their sovereignties and their submission to the colonial situation under the power of Brazilian state and society. It concludes that only the recognition of Guarani and Kaiow sovereignties, with the production of a model of shared sovereignties among State and indigenous peoples, and the restoration of pillaged lands, has some chance of producing societies of material and psychological well-being, thus overcoming the colonial genocidal State that currently exists in Brazil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternational Development and AidFrench-language works237,207