MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338615210 · doi:10.1039/c6cp01562j

Breaking the geometric magnetic frustration in controlled off-stoichiometric LuMn<sub>1+z</sub>O<sub>3+δ</sub> compounds

2016· article· en· W2338615210 on OpenAlexaff
F. Figueiras, D. V. Karpinsky, Pedro B. Tavares, Soma Das, José Vieira Leitão, E. Brück, J. Agostinho Moreira, V. S. Amaral

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersCentro de Investigação em Materiais Cerâmicos e CompósitosFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsFrustrationAntiferromagnetismStoichiometryCondensed matter physicsPerovskite (structure)Phase (matter)FerroelectricityCrystallographyMaterials scienceGravimetric analysisChemistrySpin glassSpin (aerodynamics)PhysicsThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryDielectric

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores controlled off-stoichiometric LuMn1+zO3+δ (|z| < 0.1) compounds, intended to retain the utter LuMnO3 intrinsic hexagonal symmetry and ferroelectric properties. X-ray powder diffraction measurements evidenced a single phase P63cm structure. Thermo-gravimetric experiments show a narrow impact of oxygen vacancies while a distinguishable gas exchange at ∼700 K, a surprisingly lower temperature when compared to perovskite systems. A comparison of different nominal ceramics revealed pertinent structural and magnetic property variations owing to subtle self-doping effects. Deviations from the archetypal antiferromagnetic state were detected below ∼90 K suggesting local rearrangements of the nominal Mn(3+) ions matrix, breaking the ideal geometrical spin frustration, leading to a non-compensated magnetic structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicMultiferroics and related materialsFrench-language works237,207