MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338617271

Understanding When Carsharing Displaces Vehicle Ownership

2016· article· en· W2338617271 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michiko Namazu, Hadi Dowlatabadi

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Board 95th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCar ownershipRentingBusinessApartmentService (business)Car sharingBivariate analysisWork (physics)Public transportMarketingDemographic economicsTransport engineeringEconomicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the authors analyzed the factors and conditions associated with car owners who chose carsharing (CS) over car ownership. The authors used over 3,400 responses to a survey by Metro Vancouver directed at members of three different carsharing services. Our bivariate analysis showed that out of 883 respondents who reduced their vehicle ownership after joining a carsharing service, 70% became zero vehicle households. This suggests that, in these cases, access to CS services fully substituted private vehicles. According to the regression analysis, households who tended to reduce their vehicles after joining CS were 1) single households 2) those owning multiple vehicles prior to joining CS and, 3) those living in rental housing. On the other hand, households who kept their vehicles, even after joining CS, tended to have family members working outside of home. In addition, our logit regression analysis showed that households picking up cars at locations within apartment/townhouse complex, locations close to work/school, and locations close to transit stations were less likely to relinquish personal vehicles. The expansion of CS services in these locations has been a policy target by municipal governments. If the goal of public policy is to reduce private vehicle ownership, the authors might need to explore other strategies. The authors recommend conducting follow-up surveys to capture the effect in longer time frame and in other area, such as outside of urban core. The regression analysis also found that households who reduced vehicle ownership were twice as likely to report environmental awareness as a motivation than other CS households. Considering a strong positive relationship between the intention of cost saving by CS and vehicle ownership reduction (over 3.0 odds ratio), advertising CS as a cost effective and environmental friendly transportation option would be a potent strategy to implement CS as a vehicle ownership reduction measure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Board 95th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207