MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338640933 · doi:10.1155/s1073792804142505

[no title]

2004· article· en· W2338640933 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Valentin Blomer

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMathematicsCharacter (mathematics)CombinatoricsCusp formTwistWeight functionBounded functionCusp (singularity)Mathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let f(z)=∑a(m)m(k−1)/2e(mz)∈Sk(N,χ1) be a primitive cusp form of integral weight k, level N, and character χ1. For a smooth weight function g with compact support in [M1,2M1]×[M2,2M2] and positive integers l1, l2, h, the bound ∑l1m1−l2m2=ha(m1)a(m2)¯g(m1,m2)1≪ε(l1M1+l2M2)1/2+θ+ε with θ = 7/64 is shown. As an application, the shifted sum ∑m≤Ma(m)a(m+h)¯ is bounded nontrivially for h≪M64/39−ε⁠. Furthermore, the subconvexity bound Lf(1/2+it,χ)≪εD71/167+ε for the L-function attached to the twist of f with a primitive character χ to modulus D is obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.272
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207