MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338857373 · doi:10.1180/minmag.2014.078.1.10

Putnisite, SrCa<sub>4</sub>Cr<sub>8</sub><sup>3+</sup> (CO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>8</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>(OH)<sub>16</sub>·25H<sub>2</sub>O, a new mineral from Western Australia: description and crystal structure

2014· article· en· W2338857373 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
FundersUniversity of Adelaide
KeywordsMohs scale of mineral hardnessOrthorhombic crystal systemPleochroismCrystallographyElectron microprobeChemistryX-ray crystallographyAndraditeCrystal structureOctahedronMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceQuartzDiffractionPhysicsSkarnOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Putnisite, SrCa 4 Cr 8 3+ (CO 7 ) 8 SO 4 (OH) 16 ·25H 2 O, is a new mineral from the Polar Bear peninsula, Southern Lake Cowan, Western Australia, Australia. The mineral forms isolated pseudocubic crystals up to 0.5 mm in size in a matrix composed of quartz and a near amorphous Cr silicate. Putnisite is translucent, with a pink streak and vitreous lustre. It is brittle and shows one excellent and two good cleavages parallel to {100}, {010} and {001}. The fracture is uneven and the Mohs hardness 1½−2. The measured density is 2.20(3) g/cm3 and the calculated density based on the empirical formula is 2.23 g/cm3. Optically, putnisite is biaxial negative, with α = 1.552(3), β = 1.583(3) and γ = 1.599(3) (measured in white light). The optical orientation is uncertain and pleochroism is distinct: X pale bluish grey, Y pale purple, Z pale purple. Putnisite is orthorhombic, space group Pnma , with a = 15.351(3), b = 20.421(4) Å, c = 18.270(4) Å, V = 5727(2) Å 3 (single-crystal data), and Z = 4. The strongest five lines in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern are [d(Å)( I )( hkl )]: 13.577 (100) (011), 7.659 (80) (200), 6.667 (43) (211), 5.084 (19) (222, 230), 3.689 (16) (411). Electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) gave (wt.%): Na 2 O 0.17, MgO 0.08, CaO 10.81, SrO 5.72, BaO 0.12, CuO 0.29, Cr 2 O 3 31.13, SO 3 3.95, SiO 2 0.08, Cl − 0.28, CO 2calc 17.94, H 2 O calc 30.30, O=Cl−0.06, total 100.81. The empirical formula, based on O + Cl = 69, is: Cr 8.02 3+ Ca 3.78 Sr 1.08 Na 0.11 Cu 0.07 2+ Mg 0.04 Ba 0.02 [(SO 4 ) 0.96 (SiO 4 ) 0.03 ] 0.99 (CO 3 ) 7.98 (OH) 16.19 C l0.15 ·24.84H 2 O. The crystal structure was determined from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data (Mo K α, CCD area detector and refined to R 1 = 5.84% for 3181 reflections with F 0 &gt; 4σ F . Cr(OH) 4 O 2 octahedra link by edge-sharing to form an eight-membered ring. A 10-coordinated Sr 2+ cation lies at the centre of each ring. The rings are decorated by CO3 triangles, each of which links by corner-sharing to two Cr(OH) 4 O 2 octahedra. Rings are linked by Ca(H 2 O) 4 O 4 polyhedra to form a sheet parallel to (100). Adjacent sheets are joined along [100] by corner-sharing SO 4 tetrahedra. H 2 O molecules occupy channels that run along [100] and interstices between slabs. Moderate to weak hydrogen bonding provides additional linkage between slabs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it