MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338954654

Cross-Cultural Comparison Between 7-Eleven and KEDI

2016· article· en· W2338954654 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaohui Shan, Yun Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOstensive definitionLogos Bible SoftwareWhite (mutation)CommoditySelection (genetic algorithm)ChinaDiversity (politics)AdvertisingLogo (programming language)Cross-culturalCultural diversityAestheticsSociologyBusinessPolitical scienceLinguisticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceArtLawAnthropologyPhilosophyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the Iceberg Theory, starting from three ostensive factors of logo colors, site selection and commodity management of these two convenience stores, this paper reveals the deeper cultural factors which cause differences in these three aspects and aims to enhance companies’ cross-culture awareness. In the colors of their logos, both 7-Eleven and KEDI take the same color of yellow, green and white. The admire of Japanese to white is as same as Chinese to yellow; in site selection, different thinking modes of Japan and China have great influence on it; different national characters contribute to the diversity of commodity management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207