MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338975919 · doi:10.20361/g28k5w

Wear a Helmet! Healthy Safety Habits by M.E. Salzmann

2016· article· en· W2338975919 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sean Borle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Deakin Review of Children s Literature · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInjury Epidemiology and Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)ComprehensionLiteracyPublishingSubject (documents)GlossaryPsychologyVisual artsComputer scienceLiteratureArtLibrary scienceLinguisticsPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Salzmann, Mary Elizabeth. Wear a Helmet! Healthy Safety Habits. Minneapolis, MN: Abdo Publishing, 2015, Print.This small picture book is levelled to the third or “transitional” reading level defined in the Sandcastle series. This series is designed for use in “shared, guided and independent reading and writing activities to support a balanced approach to literacy instruction”. The subject of the book is health and safety. Each photograph shows a child doing something that promotes safety: wearing a bike helmet, a life preserver or a seatbelt. Other children are shown washing hands, using a pot holder and seated at a computer to illustrate online safety. The children featured are in the 7-9 age range and are named to allow readers to relate to them more easily. Younger children will look up to older children pictured doing the right things. The text is short and very simple, designed for children who are not yet fluent readers. However, for average readers, who might pick up this book in a library, the text would be most appropriate for the lower end of the recommended age 4-9 audience. There is a brief quiz at the end of the book, aimed at a low comprehension level. Strangely, some of the definitions in the glossary contain words that are well above the reading level of the book. For example, the definition of the word “germ” includes the word “organism”. While this book is designed for reading enhancement programs, it does model useful health and safety ideas, so would be a good addition for school and public libraries.Recommendation: 3 stars out of 4Reviewer: Sean BorleSean Borle is a University of Alberta undergraduate student who is an advocate for child health and safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0920.097

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Deakin Review of Children s LiteratureSame topicInjury Epidemiology and PreventionFrench-language works237,207