Indirect Immunofluorescence for the Detection of Autoimmune Urticaria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An autoimmune basis is believed to be responsible for about half of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) cases. The autologous serum skin test is used as a possible indicator, but there is currently no test that directly indicates an autoimmune etiology. In this study, an indirect immunofluorescence was used to identify patients with autoantibodies directed at mast cells. METHODS: Two substrates were used including paraffin embedded sections of skin biopsies from an infant with bullous mastocytosis and cord blood-derived mast cells (CBMC). Sera from 76 patients with CSU were incubated with substrates and conjugated with human IgG. RESULTS: Using the bullous mastocytosis preparations, positive indirect immunofluorescence was found in 46% (n = 76), while the CBMC substrate was positive in 39% (n = 70). CONCLUSION: The IgG autoantibodies directed at mast cells could be detected in about half the patients with CSU. Indirect immunofluorescence should be considered as an indicator of the autoimmune form of CSU.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".