Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a first focus of this study, a theoretical framework was formulated in which orientations were conceptualized as ideal points on a time dimension to be utilized in predicting second generational behavior. As a second focus, a measurement of orientations was developed to provide not only means for testing the theoretical-ideas but also for developing new techniques for secondary analysis of questionnaire data. The measurement instrument, however, resulted in large experimental error. Questionnaire data were collected from a Vancouver urban school population and a sample of parents from that population. Alternatives generated by open-ended questions and coded according to a set of rules representing the time dimension were utilized in measuring parental orientations. Statistical tests on the coding of responses as well as on factors of language, sex and education showed coding and language were critical to responses generating indicators of present orientations but that sex and education were not. Testing by linear regression the behavior of the second generation against indicators of orientations of the first generation, as measured by this study, proved there is no predictive relationship between the two. An evaluation of the study was used to indicate possible directions for further investigation along both theoretical and measurement lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".