Method of Measurement of CO<sub>2</sub> Adsorbed into α-Cyclodextrin by Infra-Red CO<sub>2</sub> Probe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A simple CO2 probe system for quantifying CO2 gas adsorbed in solid matrix of α-cyclodextrin powder (α-CD) by measuring the gas concentration in the headspace was developed and validated. The essential components of this system are an infrared CO2 probe and an air tight chamber equipped with a two-fan system to uniformly mix the relatively high density CO2 gas. First, a known weight of dry ice (considered as pure CO2) was used to create different amounts of CO2 in the headspace of the chamber, and the resultant gas concentrations were measured by the probe and gas chromatography. The gas concentrations measured by both methods were quite similar (R2 = 0.9950), and the calculated amount of dry-ice in the headspace using the probe was highly comparable to the amount of dry ice initially added in the chamber (R2 = 0.9970). This system was then tested to measure adsorbed CO2 content in CO2-α-CD complexed powder by using water injection to release CO2 from the complexed powder into the headspace. The measured results using this system were quite similar (R2 = 0.9972) to those determined by a conventional acid-base titration method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".