MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339086492 · doi:10.1080/10942912.2015.1084005

Method of Measurement of CO<sub>2</sub> Adsorbed into α-Cyclodextrin by Infra-Red CO<sub>2</sub> Probe

2015· article· en· W2339086492 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Thao M. Ho, Tony Howes, Bhesh Bhandari

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Food Properties · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsCyclodextrinAdsorptionChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Physical chemistryEnvironmental chemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple CO2 probe system for quantifying CO2 gas adsorbed in solid matrix of α-cyclodextrin powder (α-CD) by measuring the gas concentration in the headspace was developed and validated. The essential components of this system are an infrared CO2 probe and an air tight chamber equipped with a two-fan system to uniformly mix the relatively high density CO2 gas. First, a known weight of dry ice (considered as pure CO2) was used to create different amounts of CO2 in the headspace of the chamber, and the resultant gas concentrations were measured by the probe and gas chromatography. The gas concentrations measured by both methods were quite similar (R2 = 0.9950), and the calculated amount of dry-ice in the headspace using the probe was highly comparable to the amount of dry ice initially added in the chamber (R2 = 0.9970). This system was then tested to measure adsorbed CO2 content in CO2-α-CD complexed powder by using water injection to release CO2 from the complexed powder into the headspace. The measured results using this system were quite similar (R2 = 0.9972) to those determined by a conventional acid-base titration method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Food PropertiesSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207