MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339095955 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.102003

Observation of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:none/><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>State of Charmonium

2005· article· lv· W2339095955 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ${h}_{c}{(}^{1}{P}_{1})$ state of charmonium has been observed in the reaction $\ensuremath{\psi}(2S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}{h}_{c}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}(\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma})(\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c})$ using $3.08\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{6}$ $\ensuremath{\psi}(2S)$ decays recorded in the CLEO detector. Data have been analyzed both for the inclusive reaction, where the decay products of the ${\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c}$ are not identified, and for exclusive reactions, in which ${\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c}$ decays are reconstructed in seven hadronic decay channels. We find $M({h}_{c})=3524.4\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.6\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.4\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$ which corresponds to a hyperfine splitting $\ensuremath{\Delta}{M}_{\mathrm{hf}}(1P)\ensuremath{\equiv}⟨M{(}^{3}{P}_{J})⟩\ensuremath{-}M{(}^{1}{P}_{1})=+1.0\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.6\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.4\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$, and $\mathcal{B}\mathbf{(}\ensuremath{\psi}(2S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}{h}_{c}\mathbf{)}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathcal{B}({h}_{c}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c})=(4.0\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.8\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.7)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it