Anwendung des COPM in einer deutschen psychiatrischen Klinik (Use of the COPM in a German Mental Health Facility)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractDas Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) wurde in einem deutschen psychiatrischen Krankenhaus angewandt, um einen Verordnungsbogen, der betätigungsorientierte Therapieziele enthält, zu entwickeln. Es wurden 11 Patienten aus zwei arbeitstherapeutischen Gruppen mit dem COPM befragt. Aus den Ergebnissen der Befragung wurde ein Verordnungsbogen für Ergotherapie erstellt. Die Studie zeigte eine gute Anwendbarkeit des COPM mit hoher Nutzerzufriedenheit, sowohl auf Seiten der Patienten als auch auf Therapeutenseite.AbstractTo design a referral system, containing occupation-based therapy goals, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was introduced to a German mental health facility. It was administered to 11 patients attending work therapy. Using the results from these interviews, a referral system for occupational therapy, containing those occupation-based therapy goals was developed. The study showed that the COPM was successfully administered in a German mental health setting as well. Patients and practitioners were satisfied with the COPM and the therapy goals developed with it.Key Words: klientenzentrierte Praxispsychiatrische BehandlungVerordnung für Ergotherapie client-centred practicemental healthoccupational therapy referral
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".