MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339278411

ANALISIS PERMINTAAN DEPOSITO BERJANGKA RUPIAH PADA BANK UMUM DI SUMATERA UTARA TAHUN 2001-2010

2015· article· id· W2339278411 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arno Richarto Gultom, Raina Linda Sari

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan · 2015
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflation (cosmology)EconomicsAgricultural economicsInflation rateQuarter (Canadian coin)Research ObjectInterest rateMonetary economicsBusinessGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main purpose of this research was to analyze the factors that affect demand deposits at commercial banks in North Sumatera. The variables that affect demand in the considered time deposits and the research object are PDRB, the interest rate on time deposits and inflation rat. This research also aims to investigate the contribution of each variable on the demand for time deposits at commercial banks in North Sumatera. To achieve the purpose of analysis, this study used time series data with a range of time during the years 2001 -2010 in quarter to quarter. The method used to estimate this research is to analyze Ordinary Least Square (OLS) in estimating the results of research. The results found that the variable deposit rate, gross domestic product, and demand deposits of one year before a positive and significant impact on demand for time deposits at commercial banks in North Sumatera. Keywords : Demand Deposit , PDRB, the interest rate , inflation rate

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ekonomi dan KeuanganSame topicFinancial Analysis and Corporate GovernanceFrench-language works237,207