MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2339325851 · doi:10.1149/ma2014-04/4/653

Investigations on Mechanisms of Ionic Transport and Phase Transition in Insertion Electrode Materials for Lithium/Sodium-Ion Batteries

2014· article· en· W2339325851 on OpenAlexaff
Xuejie Huang, Yang Sun, Xia Lu, Huilin Pan, Liang Zhao, Yong‐Sheng Hu, Lin Gu, Hong Li, Liquan Chen, Ruijuan Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithium (medication)AnodeIonMaterials scienceIonic bondingElectrochemistryBattery (electricity)CathodeElectrodePhase (matter)Scanning transmission electron microscopyTransmission electron microscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical engineeringChemistryNanotechnologyPhysical chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insertion electrode materials are included in the majority of ambient-temperature Li/Na-ion batteries, which attract increasing attention in energy storage. Being a commercialized cathode material of Li ion battery, olivine LiFePO4 has undergone intensive research. Previously, the two-phase separation mechanism upon charging was well accepted, while recent experimental results indicates a more subtle atomic structure, lithium-staging, exists upon charging. We show that, through first-principles calculations, the observed lithium-staging configuration in partially delithiated LiFePO4is a kinetically controlled thermodynamically metastable state. Our results shed light on the interactions between electron and ion and hence may have general implications for investigating the ionic transport in other strongly correlated mixed conductor materials. [1] Spinel Li4Ti5O12 is well-known as a “zero-strain” anode for lithium-ion batteries. We found that it can also accommodate sodium ions, displaying an average storage voltage of 0.91V vs. Na+/Na. Through combined density functional theory calculations and scanning transmission electron microscope imaging techniques, a three-phase separation reaction, which has never been seen in any insertion electrode materials for lithium- or sodium-ion batteries, is confirmed in the sodiation process of Li4Ti5O12. Furthermore, interfacial structure is clearly resolved at an atomic scale in electrochemically sodiated Li4Ti5O12for the first time via the advanced electron microscopy. [2] Acknowledge: This work was supported by funding from the “863” Project (2009AA033101), “973” Projects (2013CB934002,2009CB220104) Reference: [1] Yang Sun, Xia Lu, Ruijuan Xiao, Hong Li, and Xuejie Huang. Chem. Mater. 24 (2012) 4693. [2] Yang Sun, Liang Zhao, Huilin Pan, Xia Lu, Lin Gu, Yong-Sheng Hu, Hong Li, Michel Armand, Yuichi Ikuhara, Liquan Chen and Xuejie Huang. Nat. Commun. 4 (2013) 1870

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→