Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Relational psychoanalysis tends to reject Freud’s theory of instinctual drives and its search for impersonal “causes” of psychic life. But are we not perhaps discarding something important, an obscure intuition of the unknown aspects of human nature? Human experience, thought, and action are truly personal, but we also frequently feel our acts, emotions, and opinions as something we cannot choose, a current that carries us away and does not spring from ourselves or any identifiable person. For Freud, these currents sprang from bodily existence. But there is still another form of impersonal driving forces, which comes from having been conformed by and being a part of social systems. These two kinds of impersonal driving currents act on, in, and through the person, as postulated by Foulkes and Pichon-Riviere, the pioneers of group analysis. This may be represented by the metaphor of the wind, the tide, and the vessel. The self is a sailing vessel; the wind that blows the sails corresponds to the social currents, while the tide, deep, dark, and thriving with invisible life, corresponds to the bodily existence. Life is a permanent negotiation of all these elements, in order to make the trip feasible, fruitful, and happy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it