MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2339432827 · doi:10.14288/1.0100005

A vegetation description of two ecological reserves in interior British Columbia

2010· article· en· W2339432827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shirley Dale Larmour

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVegetation (pathology)GeographyEcologyNature reserveForestryEnvironmental scienceArchaeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this thesis is to provide a vegetation description of two Ecological Reserves in Interior British Columbia. The Ecological Reserves studied were Trout Creek, near Penticton and Tranquille, near Kamloops. These areas were studied using quadrats placed within community types subjectively determined on the basis of species dominance and physiognomy. Soil samples were taken and brief profile descriptions made. Field data were examined subjectively and modifications of the original units made where necessary. A Bray-Curtis Ordination was done on the data from each reserve. Four communities were defined in Trout Creek. The most extensive community is the Pinus ponderosa/Agropyron spicatum community. This occurs on terraces and slopes and is dominated by Pinus ponderosa in the tree layer and Agropyron spicatum in the herb layer. Chrysothamnus nauseosus is the most common shrub. On talus slopes is the Pinus ponderosa/Pseudotsuga menziesii/Amelanchier alnifolia community. Pinus and Pseudotsuga occur together in the overstory and Amelanchier alnifolia is the most common shrub. The ground cover is sparse. In small areas of rock outcropping are Selaginella wallacei communities in which the ground cover is dominated by this vascular cryptogam. In one very small, protected area, is the Pinus ponderosa/Pseudotsuga menziesii/Calamagrostis rubescens community. This community has a dense layer of young Pinus and Pseudotsuga and a ground cover of the grass Calamagrostis rubescens. Four communities were also defined in Tranquille. On the flat valley bottom, is the Artemisia tridentata/Poa sandbergii/Stipa comata community. Artemisia tridentata dominates the shrub layer and Poa sandbergii and Stipa comata are codominants in the herb layer. There is no tree layer. This community is probably overgrazed. Most of the lower slopes of the reserve are covered by the Pinus ponderosa/Agropyron spicatum community. This community is dominated by Pinus ponderosa in the canopy and Agropyron spicatum in the herb layer. The sparse shrub layer is composed mainly of Chrysothamnus nauseosus and Artemisia tridentata. Also on the lower slopes, in small areas interspersed within the Pinus/Agropyron community is the Pinus ponderosa/ Aristida longiseta community, in which the grass Aristida longiseta becomes a codominant in the herb layer. Above about 760 meters, the vegetation is predominantly the Pseudotsuga menziesii/Pinus ponderosa/Agropyron spicatum community. Pseudotsuga becomes codominant or dominant in the canopy layer. Agropyron spicatum is still dominant in the herb layer but the clumps are smaller and more widely spaced. The Bray-Curtis Ordinations support the community breakdowns. The soils are Brunisols in Trout Creek and Regosols and Chernozems in Tranquille. Soil profile descriptions are given and data on various physical and chemical characteristics of the soils are presented. A comparison of the reserves is made. It is recommended that the Trout Creek Reserve be high priority for fencing. This is not necessary for Tranquille.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies→French-language works237,207→