MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339449145 · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2004.0040

Relationship Between Hemoglobin Levels and Quality of Life During Radiation Therapy Plus Concomitant or Sequential Chemotherapy in Patients With Cancer and Anemia Treated With Epoetin Alfa

2004· article· en· W2339449145 on OpenAlex
Daniel Shasha, Pierre Y. Crémieux, Louis B. Harrison

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpoetin alfaHemoglobinAnemiaQuality of life (healthcare)ConcomitantInternal medicineCancerRadiation therapyChemotherapyGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study in patients with cancer and anemia, who were receiving chemoradiation and were treated with epoetin alfa, examined the relationship between hemoglobin level and quality of life (QOL), change in hemoglobin and change in QOL, and incremental (1 g/dL) increase in hemoglobin and related incremental improvement in QOL. Data from a multicenter, open-label, prospective study of once-weekly epoetin alfa therapy in anemic cancer patients receiving chemoradiation were used to retrospectively evaluate the relationship between hemoglobin changes and QOL changes via correlation and longitudinal analyses. A sample selection correction method was used to ensure unbiased results. QOL (energy, activity, overall QOL) was measured using the Linear Analog Scale Assessment. An incremental analysis determined the greatest incremental increase in QOL associated with a 1 g/dL increase in hemoglobin level. Of the 777 patients enrolled, 464 met chemotherapy and radiotherapy eligibility criteria. Of these, 359 (77%) underwent two QOL assessments and were eligible for analysis. A nonlinear and statistically significant positive correlation was found between hemoglobin levels and Linear Analog Scale Assessment QOL scores (r = 0.32 [energy], 0.33 [activity], and 0.29 [overall QOL]; P < .0001). An incremental analysis used regression methods to characterize the changes in hemoglobin levels and QOL scores. Hemoglobin change was found to be a statistically significant determinant of QOL changes (P < .05). The greatest incremental QOL gain associated with a 1-g/dL change in hemoglobin occurred around hemoglobin 12 g/dL (range, 11-13 g/dL). A direct relationship exists between hemoglobin increases and corresponding QOL increases. Maximal incremental gain in QOL occurred when hemoglobin was approximately 12 g/dL (range, 11-13 g/dL).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it