MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2339500635 · doi:10.1149/ma2014-02/21/1208

The Stability of Nano-Structured-Thin-Film™ Supported Ir on Pt PEMFC Catalysts Under Rde Simulated Start-up and Shut-Down

2014· article· en· W2339500635 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy C Crowtz, R. J. Sanderson, J. R. Dahn

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellCatalysisElectrochemistryChemistryTime constantInstabilityMaterials scienceElectrodeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MechanicsElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringPhysical chemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The instability of Pt oxygen reduction electro-catalysts is a principle cause of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) performance decline, and the main causes of this instability are load cycling and start-up shut-down (su/sd). The extent of Pt loss is primarily a function of 1) rate of potential change 2) upper potential limit.1 Work by 3M and partners on PEMFCs with Nano Structured Thin Film (NSTF) supported catalysts have shown minute amounts (2 – 10 µg cm2) of Ir added to Pt does not adversely affect Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity and is effective in protecting Pt (loss < 10%) under simulated su/sd condition2 The rotating disk electrode (RDE) can also be used to study the behavior of NSTF supported catalysts.3 Many rotating disk electrode (RDE) durability studies subject candidate PEMFC electro-catalysts to triangular wave potential cycling. Stevens et al. have developed alternative electrochemical techniques to simulate the transient potentials associated with load cycling and su/sd.with the RDE.4Figure 1 shows the potential changes of one su/sd “pulse”, designed to simulate run, idle and rest potential with constant potential holds, and simulate start-up and shut-down with constant current holds. This unique approach allows the upper potential limit to change as the test progresses. Figure 2 shows how ORR activity changes under repeated su/sd “pulses” for various loadings of Ir on NSTF supported Pt (85 µg/cm2). Markers are also colored according to the final potential the constant current hold reaches prior to ORR characterization. The highest Ir loading of 19.1µg/cm2 reaches a stable state, where the ORR activity changes very little after 2500 su/sd pulses. For a lower Ir loading (10 µg/cm2) tested at the same current, the ORR activity continually declines. However for the same Ir loading of 10 µg/cm2 tested at 2/5th the current, ORR activity seems to achieve near stability. The results show an interesting relationship between the stability of Ir on Pt electro-catalysts, and the potential reached by the su/sd simulation current. When potential starts and stays below a threshold of approximately 1.5 VRHE, the Ir-Pt reaches a stable configuration where ORR and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity no longer decline. Achieving stability may be more dependant on the potential reached, or the charge delivered, than the Ir loading. Note that for pure Pt tested at a current an order of magnitude lower than the 19.2 µg/cm2 Ir sample, and started at a potential of 1.35 VRHE, ORR activity continued to decline, indicating that stability of the RDE-NSTF catalyst system requires both low (< 1.5 VRHE) potential and the presence of Ir. These results indicate a possibility of indefinitely stable Pt based PEMFC catalysts, and the important role the su/sd potential may play in determining stability of an Ir-Pt electro-catalyst. Work is ongoing to determine Ir loading thresholds for stability. 1. A. A. Topalov, I. Katsounaros, M. Auinger, S. Cherevko, J. C. Meier, S. O. Klemm, and K. J. J. Mayrhofer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 51, 12613–12615 (2012). 2. R. T. Atanasoski, D. A. Cullen, G. D. Vernstrom, G. M. Haugen, and L. L. Atanasoska, ECS Electrochem. Lett., 2, F25–F28 (2013). 3. G. C.-K. Liu, R. J. Sanderson, G. Vernstrom, D. A. Stevens, R. T. Atanasoski, M. K. Debe, and J. R. Dahn, J. Electrochem. Soc., 157, B207 (2010). 4. D. A. Stevens, J. Harlow, R. J. Sanderson, C. W. Watson, T. J. Crowtz, J. R. Dahn, G. D. Vernstrom, L. L. Atanasoska, G. M. Haugen, and R. T. Atanasoski, ECS Trans., 50, 1533–1538 (2013).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion→French-language works237,207→