MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W233952450

Perspectivas económicas para 2014

2014· article· es· W233952450 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angel Laborda Peralta

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Obras Públicas: Organo profesional de los ingenieros de caminos, canales y puertos · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecessionGreat recessionQuarter (Canadian coin)HumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyCartographyEconomyEconomicsArtKeynesian economics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolAunque en 2013 en su conjunto el PIB y el empleo de la economia espanola volvieron a registrar caidas significativas respecto al ano anterior, lo mas relevante fue que a lo largo del ano la recesion toco fondo. El PIB empezo a aumentar modestamente en el tercer trimestre y el empleo lo hizo en el cuarto. Puede darse, por tanto, por terminada la segunda recesion de esta larga crisis que empezara en 2007. Tras los ajustes, saneamientos y reformas llevados a cabo en estos duros anos, la economia ya esta en condiciones para echar a andar, aunque no para echar a correr. Y es que, aunque la recesion haya terminado, la crisis aun no esta vencida. EnglishWhile in 2013 the Spanish GDP and employment figures once again revealed significant drops with respect to the previous year, the most relevant factor throughout this period was that the recession finally appeared to have come to an end. The GDP began to rise somewhat modestly in the third quarter and employment followed suit in the fourth quarter. Spain has subsequently pulled out of the second recession of this long crisis that began back in 2007. After all the adjustments, purges and reforms carried out over these hard years, the economy is now in a position to move forward slowly, but not to pick up pace, as while the recession can now be said to be over, the crisis has not yet passed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Obras Públicas: Organo profesional de los ingenieros de caminos, canales y puertosSame topicSocial Sciences and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207