MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339528210 · doi:10.5539/jmsr.v5n3p42

Quartz Crystal Microbalance Monitoring of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Sol during the Freeze–Thaw Process

2016· article· en· W2339528210 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yoshimi Seida, Mitsuteru Ogawa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Science Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsVinyl alcoholQuartz crystal microbalanceMaterials scienceViscoelasticityPorosityChemical engineeringPhase (matter)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialPolymerChromatographyChemistryOrganic chemistryAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p class="1Body">A quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) working under cryo-conditions was applied to analyzing the gelation and/or phase behavior of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) sol during repeated freeze–thaw processes. The development of a porous structure with the gelation of PVA sol during the freeze–thaw cycle was examined in terms of the thermal behavior of the water in the sol and the viscoelastic behavior of the sol through thermal and QCM analyses. Water was liberated from the hydrophilic PVA during the freeze–thaw process through the aggregation of PVA. The water decreased the freezing temperature and increased the melting temperature because of the development of the porous structure with gelation by the thermal treatment. The state of the water during the gelation was estimated from the phase transition temperature and enthalpy change of the water during the thermal scan by using water-saturated silica gels with a series of pore size distributions. The viscoelasticity of the PVA sol during the freeze–thaw process was measured by cryo-QCM using admittance analysis (QCM-A). The free water and/or porous structure in the PVA sol was found to increase from the viscoelastic point of view by QCM measurements showing a shift in the resonance parameters (<em>f</em><sub>s</sub>, <em>R</em><sub>1</sub>). A hard gel was confirmed to form by the decrease in <em>f</em><sub>s</sub> and the increase in <em>R</em><sub>1</sub> with the thermal scan treatment. The cryo-QCM was found to be an effective probe for clarifying the gelation and phase behavior of PVA sol in detail with high resolution.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Science ResearchSame topicAcoustic Wave Resonator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207