Accuracy of the ImmunoCyt assay in the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ImmunoCyt assay (Diagnocure Inc., Québec, Canada) is a new immunocytological fluorescence test for identifying two different mucins and a high-molecular-weight glycosylated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) present in tumours originating from transitional epithelial cells. The test promises a higher diagnostic sensitivity in transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder than voided urine cytology. Our study was designed to evaluate this test especially for TaG1 carcinomas, which are characterised by a low detection rate in urinary cytology. A total of 121 spontaneous urine samples of 92 patients (age range 28 to 86, mean 62.5 years) were examined. The samples were taken from patients suspected of having TCC (41 out of 121) or tumor recurrence (46 out of 121), or who were part of a follow-up protocol (34 out of 121). Cystoscopy was practiced in all patients. The ImmunoCyt test was carried out according to the manufacturer's protocol. For cytology cytospins were made from the same urine samples and stained according to the method of Papanicolaou. One hundred and thirteen specimens could be evaluated. In 87 cystoscopy and/or histology were negative. There was histological evidence of 7 pTaG1, 4 pTaG2, 8 pT1G2/G3 and 7 pT2G2/G3 TCC. As for ImmunoCyt and cytology, specificity was 83.9% and 91.9%, respectively. A combination of either test indicated 81.6% specificity. The sensitivity amounted to 38.5% and 34.6%, respectively, and the combined sensitivity to 53.8%. The sensitivity for TaG1 carcinomas was 14.3% each, for TaG2 carcinomas 25% and 50%, for T1G2/G3 carcinomas it amounted to 37.5% each, while for T2G2/G3 carcinomas it was 71.4% and 42.9%, respectively. The higher sensitivity of the ImmunoCyt test as compared to urinary cytology renders improved identification of exfoliated tumour cells in bladder cancer possible. In our study, however, the expected increase in detecting TaG1 carcinomas was not found. Because of its lower specificity, the test should only be used in combination with voided urine cytology. On account of its low sensitivity, the ImmunoCyt test cannot replace cystoscopy (with biopsy) in the diagnosis and monitoring of bladder cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".